antarctica: have thick ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.59
, continent
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, territory
Weight: 0.53
Siblings equatorial guinea
Weight: 0.33
, niger
Weight: 0.33
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.33
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, montana
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick ice 1.00
have ice 0.90
is ice 0.89
be made of ice 0.86
be made out of ice 0.86
be covered with ice 0.86
be covered in ice 0.86
is ice melting 0.86
be full of ice 0.84
lose ice 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(antarctica, have ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(antarctica, is ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be made of ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be made out of ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(antarctica, be made out of ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(antarctica, is ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(antarctica, be made of ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(antarctica, be covered with ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(antarctica, be made of ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be made out of ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(antarctica, be covered in ice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(antarctica, be covered in ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(antarctica, be covered with ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(antarctica, be made out of ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, is ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be made of ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be covered in ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be covered with ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(antarctica, be full of ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, lose ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(antarctica, be full of ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(antarctica, lose ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be full of ice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(antarctica, is ice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(antarctica, lose ice)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(antarctica, lose ice)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be covered in ice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be covered with ice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(antarctica, have ice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(antarctica, have ice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be full of ice)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, have ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, have thick ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(antarctica, have thick ice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(antarctica, have thick ice)