anteater: has physical part snouts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.55
, mammal
Weight: 0.46
, creature
Weight: 0.44
, wildlife
Weight: 0.40
, word
Weight: 0.34
Siblings opossum
Weight: 0.35
, orangutan
Weight: 0.35
, tapir
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35
, lizard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part snouts 1.00
have long snouts 0.96
has physical part noses 0.81
has physical part tails 0.80
have long noses 0.78
have long tails 0.76
has physical part nose 0.76
have big tails 0.75
has physical part tail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tapir, has physical part snouts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tapir, has physical part nose)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tapir, has physical part noses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tortoise, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(opossum, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tapir, have long noses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tapir, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tapir, has physical part snouts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tapir, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tapir, has physical part noses)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tapir, has physical part nose)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tapir, has physical part nose)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tapir, have long noses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tapir, have long noses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tortoise, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tortoise, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(opossum, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(opossum, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(opossum, have long tails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(opossum, have long tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(anteater, have long snouts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part noses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(anteater, have long noses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(anteater, have long tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(anteater, have big tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part nose)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part noses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(anteater, has physical part noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(anteater, have long snouts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part nose)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(anteater, has physical part nose)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(anteater, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part nose)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(anteater, has physical part tail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(anteater, have long noses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(anteater, have long snouts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(anteater, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(anteater, have big tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(anteater, have long tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(anteater, have long noses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(anteater, have long snouts)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(anteater, have big tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anteater, have long tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(anteater, have long noses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(anteater, have big tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(anteater, have long tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(tapir, has physical part snouts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tapir, has physical part noses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tapir, has physical part nose)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tortoise, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tapir, have long noses)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(opossum, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(opossum, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(anteater, has physical part snouts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)