antimony: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.53
, drug
Weight: 0.51
Siblings molybdenum
Weight: 0.36
, tungsten
Weight: 0.36
, zinc
Weight: 0.36
, tantalum
Weight: 0.36
, copper sulfate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
be valuable to us 0.91
is valuable 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tungsten, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tungsten, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tungsten, is valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(antimony, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(antimony, be valuable to us)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(antimony, be valuable to us)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(antimony, be valuable to us)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(antimony, be valuable to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(antimony, is valuable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(antimony, is valuable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(antimony, is valuable)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(antimony, is valuable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(antimony, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(antimony, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(antimony, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tungsten, is valuable)