antique: be valuable

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, book
Weight: 0.59
, hobby
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pocket watch
Weight: 0.59
, jewelry
Weight: 0.34
, woodworking
Weight: 0.34
, pottery
Weight: 0.34
, art
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable 1.00
be valuable for learn 0.94
be consider valuable 0.92
be valuable as well as old 0.87
be made of valuable metal 0.85
be important 0.80
be important to have 0.78
be important for learn 0.78
be beautiful as well as useful 0.78
be important to human 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be made of valuable metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, be consider valuable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be beautiful as well as useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(art, be important to human)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jewelry, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be valuable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(jewelry, be consider valuable)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be consider valuable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(jewelry, be made of valuable metal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(jewelry, be made of valuable metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pottery, be beautiful as well as useful)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pottery, be beautiful as well as useful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(art, be important to human)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(art, be important to human)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(antique, be valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(antique, be valuable as well as old)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(antique, be valuable as well as old)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(antique, be valuable as well as old)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable as well as old)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(antique, be valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(jewelry, be consider valuable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(jewelry, be valuable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(art, be important to human)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(jewelry, be made of valuable metal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(antique, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pottery, be beautiful as well as useful)