aol: is bad company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.67
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.64
, search engine
Weight: 0.63
, web browser
Weight: 0.60
Siblings yahoo
Weight: 0.37
, google
Weight: 0.36
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.35
, netscape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad company 1.00
has state company 0.87
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aol, is bad company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(aol, is bad company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(google, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(google, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(aol, is bad company)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(aol, has state company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aol, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aol, has state company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aol, has state company)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(aol, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(aol, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aol, has state company)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aol, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aol, is bad company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(aol, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)