apartheid: was crime against humanity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.60
, injustice
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.55
, atrocity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings segregation
Weight: 0.34
, racism
Weight: 0.34
, slavery
Weight: 0.33
, genocide
Weight: 0.33
, occupation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was crime against humanity 1.00
be crime against humanity 0.99
perpetuate crime in africa 0.75
perpetuate crime in south africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(genocide, be crime against humanity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(genocide, be crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(genocide, be crime against humanity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(apartheid, was crime against humanity)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, be crime against humanity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(apartheid, be crime against humanity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(apartheid, be crime against humanity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(apartheid, be crime against humanity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, perpetuate crime in south africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(apartheid, perpetuate crime in south africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(apartheid, perpetuate crime in africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(apartheid, perpetuate crime in south africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, perpetuate crime in africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(apartheid, perpetuate crime in africa)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(apartheid, perpetuate crime in africa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apartheid, perpetuate crime in south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(apartheid, was crime against humanity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apartheid, was crime against humanity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(genocide, be crime against humanity)