apartment: be expensive in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents house
Weight: 0.63
, space
Weight: 0.63
, bedroom
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.68
, ground floor
Weight: 0.65
, townhouse
Weight: 0.54
, duplex
Weight: 0.50
, high rise
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in california 1.00
is parking laws california 0.85
be expensive in miami 0.82
be expensive in dallas 0.81
be expensive in new york 0.79
be expensive in bangkok 0.78
live in america like 0.77
be in japan 0.77
be in tokyo 0.76
be in boston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be in boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(apartment, is parking laws california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(apartment, be in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in boston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(apartment, be in boston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(apartment, is parking laws california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in boston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(apartment, is parking laws california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in tokyo)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apartment, be in boston)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(apartment, be in japan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(apartment, be in tokyo)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(apartment, is parking laws california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in tokyo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(apartment, be in tokyo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hotel room, be in boston)