apathy: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.69
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.58
, reason
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings intolerance
Weight: 0.34
, lack
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, amnesia
Weight: 0.34
, tiredness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
is best quality 0.85
was bad 0.85
is bad thing 0.79
be seen as bad thing 0.76
feel good 0.76
has quality sin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(amnesia, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lack, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(tiredness, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laziness, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, was bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lack, be seen as bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(amnesia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(amnesia, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(laziness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lack, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(intolerance, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(intolerance, is best quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is best quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(laziness, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(laziness, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(intolerance, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intolerance, was bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(intolerance, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(laziness, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(laziness, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(tiredness, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(tiredness, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(laziness, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality sin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(lack, be seen as bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(lack, be seen as bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(apathy, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(apathy, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apathy, is bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(apathy, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality sin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality sin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(apathy, is bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(apathy, has quality sin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(apathy, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(amnesia, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intolerance, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(laziness, is bad thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lack, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intolerance, is best quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality sin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(intolerance, was bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(laziness, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tiredness, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(lack, be seen as bad thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(apathy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)