apathy: has quality sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.69
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.58
, reason
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings intolerance
Weight: 0.34
, lack
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, amnesia
Weight: 0.34
, tiredness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sin 1.00
is deadly sin 0.86
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lack, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality sin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is deadly sin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(laziness, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality sin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(laziness, is deadly sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(laziness, is deadly sin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(intolerance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lack, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(apathy, has quality sin)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(apathy, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apathy, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apathy, has quality sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality sin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(laziness, is deadly sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(intolerance, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lack, has quality bad)