apathy: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.69
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.58
, reason
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings intolerance
Weight: 0.34
, lack
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, amnesia
Weight: 0.34
, tiredness
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be different from problems 0.82
be research problem 0.82
be such problem in america 0.78
be problem to farmers 0.78
is issue 0.78
be serious problem in africa 0.78
be serious problem in south africa 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lack, be problem to farmers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(apathy, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(intolerance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(intolerance, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(intolerance, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is social problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(intolerance, is issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(intolerance, is issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lack, be serious problem in africa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lack, be problem to farmers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lack, be problem to farmers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(apathy, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(apathy, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(intolerance, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(intolerance, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(intolerance, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in south africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lack, be serious problem in africa)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lack, be problem to farmers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(apathy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)