ape: has physical part fingernails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, monkey
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, beast
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chimpanzee
Weight: 0.75
, orangutan
Weight: 0.74
, bonobo
Weight: 0.63
, gorilla
Weight: 0.60
, great ape
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fingernails 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part skin 0.82
has physical part noses 0.81
has physical part fangs 0.78
has physical part eyes 0.78
has physical part tails 0.76
have large teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(gorilla, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(gorilla, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(gorilla, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ape, has physical part fingernails)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(ape, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ape, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gorilla, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ape, has physical part fingernails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)