aphid: be adapted eat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.58
, habitat
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, garden
Weight: 0.49
Siblings beetle
Weight: 0.38
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, moth
Weight: 0.37
, termite
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted eat 1.00
eat 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beetle, eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(termite, eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(termite, eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(termite, eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beetle, eat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beetle, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(aphid, be adapted eat)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(aphid, eat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(aphid, eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(aphid, eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(aphid, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aphid, be adapted eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(termite, eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aphid, be adapted eat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beetle, eat)