apology: be for pedophilia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents confession
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, statement
Weight: 0.55
, message
Weight: 0.55
, gesture
Weight: 0.53
Siblings disclaimer
Weight: 0.52
, remark
Weight: 0.33
, bank statement
Weight: 0.33
, invitation
Weight: 0.32
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for pedophilia 1.00
be for pedophilia at + 13 0.95
be for pedophilia on philosophy 0.93
be for pedophilia at + 13 on philosophy 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(apology, be for pedophilia)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13 on philosophy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia on philosophy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13 on philosophy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(apology, be for pedophilia on philosophy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13 on philosophy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia on philosophy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(apology, be for pedophilia at + 13 on philosophy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(apology, be for pedophilia on philosophy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(apology, be for pedophilia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apology, be for pedophilia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(apology, be for pedophilia)