apostrophe: is more effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, device
Weight: 0.55
, letter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings comma
Weight: 0.34
, ellipsis
Weight: 0.33
, vowel
Weight: 0.33
, pronoun
Weight: 0.32
, verb
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more effective 1.00
is effective 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(comma, is effective)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ellipsis, is effective)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(verb, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(verb, is effective)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(verb, is effective)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ellipsis, is effective)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ellipsis, is effective)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(comma, is effective)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(comma, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(apostrophe, is more effective)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apostrophe, is effective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(apostrophe, is effective)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(apostrophe, is effective)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(apostrophe, is more effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(verb, is effective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ellipsis, is effective)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apostrophe, is more effective)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(comma, is effective)