app: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software
Weight: 0.66
, tool
Weight: 0.66
, version
Weight: 0.58
, project
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pandora
Weight: 0.68
, foursquare
Weight: 0.67
, dictionary
Weight: 0.65
, website
Weight: 0.63
, notepad
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dictionary, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(app, be good for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(app, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(website, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dictionary, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dictionary, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(app, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(app, be important for business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(app, be important for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(app, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(app, be important for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(app, be important for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(app, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(app, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(app, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(app, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dictionary, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(app, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)