apparatus: has degree zip

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum tube
Weight: 0.62
, elevator
Weight: 0.61
, test tube
Weight: 0.61
, boiler
Weight: 0.60
, condenser
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has degree zip 1.00
has degree low 0.85
zip 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has degree low)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(vacuum tube, has degree low)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has degree low)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(apparatus, has degree zip)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(apparatus, zip)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(apparatus, zip)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, zip)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(apparatus, zip)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has degree zip)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apparatus, has degree zip)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has degree zip)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has degree low)