appeal: be taken on matters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taken on matters 1.00
be taken on matters of law 0.95
be in matter 0.81
is matter 0.80
matter 0.79
be called matter 0.79
is taken 0.79
be different from matter 0.78
does appear different from matter 0.77
appear different from matter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(matter, matter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(matter, matter)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(matter, matter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(appeal, be taken on matters)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters of law)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(appeal, be taken on matters of law)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters of law)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(appeal, be taken on matters of law)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(appeal, is taken)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(appeal, is taken)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(appeal, is taken)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(appeal, is taken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(appeal, be taken on matters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be taken on matters)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(matter, matter)