appeal: be to person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to person 1.00
be different from person to person 0.97
differ from person to person 0.91
be different from person 0.91
make person stronger 0.81
differ from person 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(challenge, make person stronger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appeal, be to person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(challenge, make person stronger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(challenge, make person stronger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be different from person)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be different from person to person)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(attraction, differ from person to person)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(attraction, differ from person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(challenge, make person stronger)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(appeal, be to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(attraction, be different from person to person)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(attraction, be different from person to person)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(attraction, differ from person to person)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attraction, differ from person to person)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(attraction, be different from person)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(attraction, be different from person)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(attraction, differ from person)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(attraction, differ from person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(appeal, be to person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appeal, be to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(challenge, make person stronger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(attraction, differ from person)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attraction, be different from person to person)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(attraction, differ from person to person)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(attraction, be different from person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appeal, be to person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(challenge, make person stronger)