appeal: be to person fallacious

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to person fallacious 1.00
is fallacy 0.80
was created false 0.76
be different from person to person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(attraction, be different from person to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(attraction, be different from person to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(attraction, be different from person to person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(appeal, be to person fallacious)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(appeal, is fallacy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(appeal, is fallacy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appeal, is fallacy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(appeal, is fallacy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person fallacious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(appeal, be to person fallacious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be to person fallacious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attraction, be different from person to person)