appeal: heard by courts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
heard by courts 1.00
be heard by courts 1.00
heard by higher courts 0.96
be heard by higher courts 0.96
be in small claims court 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by courts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(appeal, heard by courts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(appeal, heard by courts)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(appeal, heard by higher courts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by courts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(claim, be in small claims court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(appeal, heard by courts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(claim, be in small claims court)