appeal: work in utah

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in utah 1.00
is jackson kevin hart 0.77
is jackson 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(action, is jackson)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(action, is jackson) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(action, is jackson)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(action, is jackson kevin hart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(appeal, work in utah)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(appeal, work in utah)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, work in utah)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(action, is jackson)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(appeal, work in utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(action, is jackson kevin hart)