appendix: be non functional in humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents text
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, page
Weight: 0.58
, organ
Weight: 0.57
Siblings spleen
Weight: 0.32
, large intestine
Weight: 0.32
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.32
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.32
, intestine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be non functional in humans 1.00
be in human 0.77
be in human considered 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(appendix, be non functional in humans)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(appendix, be in human)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(appendix, be in human considered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(appendix, be in human)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(appendix, be in human considered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(appendix, be in human)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(appendix, be in human considered)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(appendix, be in human)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appendix, be in human considered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(appendix, be non functional in humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(appendix, be non functional in humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(appendix, be non functional in humans)