apple juice: be cheap in relation to cost of apples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents juice
Weight: 0.79
, drink
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, soft drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings tomato juice
Weight: 0.43
, carrot juice
Weight: 0.42
, grape juice
Weight: 0.42
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.42
, lime juice
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap in relation to cost of apples 1.00
be cheap in relation to cost 0.92
be cheap in relation 0.88
is cheap 0.80
is cheaper 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is cheap)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is cheap)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple juice, is cheap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is cheap)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is cheap)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple juice, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(apple juice, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is cheap)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)