apple pie: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.75
, apple
Weight: 0.74
, dish
Weight: 0.71
, pie
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.40
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.39
, custard
Weight: 0.38
, pumpkin
Weight: 0.37
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apple, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apple, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dish, be at resturant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at resturant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at resturant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dish, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(apple, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(apple pie, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(apple pie, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(apple, be at resturant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(apple, be at resturant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple pie, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dish, be at resturant)