apple tree: be at canada

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.90
, tree
Weight: 0.80
, plant
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.45
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.44
, oak tree
Weight: 0.44
, maple tree
Weight: 0.42
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at canada 1.00
be at australia 0.87
be find in malaysia 0.81
be at new mexico 0.79
be at america 0.79
be at spain 0.77
be at illinois 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tree, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tree, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tree, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at canada)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at spain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at spain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at spain)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at spain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at america)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at new mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at australia)