apple: be at dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.63
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, macintosh
Weight: 0.55
, apple tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dinner 1.00
be eat after dinner 0.92
follow dinner 0.87
be used to dessert 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(apple, be at dinner)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(apple, be at dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dessert, follow dinner)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, follow dinner)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apple, be at dinner)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(apple, be at dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(apple, be at dinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(apple, be at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, follow dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(apple, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dessert, follow dinner)