apple: be better than pineapple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, crab apple
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, forbidden fruit
Weight: 0.57
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pineapple 1.00
be better than bananas 0.85
be more popular than pears 0.81
be more expensive than bananas 0.81
be better than green apples 0.81
be better than apples 0.80
be healthier than red apples 0.80
be better than big apples 0.79
produce more energy than lemons 0.78
be healthier than apples 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(apple, be better than pineapple)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(apple, be more expensive than bananas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(apple, be more expensive than bananas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apple, be more expensive than bananas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(apple, be more expensive than bananas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(apple, be better than apples)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(apple, be better than apples)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(apple, be better than apples)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(apple, be better than apples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(apple, be better than pineapple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(apple, be better than pineapple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(apple, be better than pineapple)