apple: cost money

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.63
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, macintosh
Weight: 0.55
, apple tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost money 1.00
be expensive to purchase 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apple, cost money)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apple, cost money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(item, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(item, cost money)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(item, be expensive to purchase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(item, cost money)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apple, cost money)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(item, be expensive to purchase)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apple, cost money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(apple, cost money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(apple, cost money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apple, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, be expensive to purchase)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, cost money)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(apple, cost money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(item, be expensive to purchase)