apple: is successful company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, crab apple
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful company 1.00
is successful 0.89
has state company 0.83
be in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(apple, is successful company)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(apple, is successful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(apple, is successful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(apple, is successful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(apple, has state company)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(apple, has state company)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(apple, has state company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(apple, be in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple, be in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple, be in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple, has state company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple, is successful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple, be in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple, is successful company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(apple, is successful company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(apple, is successful company)