application: cost money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, method
Weight: 0.63
, contact
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings search engine
Weight: 0.68
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, attachment
Weight: 0.67
, authorization
Weight: 0.66
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost money 1.00
make money 0.85
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(contact, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(contact, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(contact, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(contact, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(application, cost money)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(application, make money)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(application, make money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(application, make money)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(application, make money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(application, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(contact, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(application, cost money)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(contact, is expensive)