appointment: be in samarra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.67
, application
Weight: 0.62
, date
Weight: 0.59
, commitment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.62
, board
Weight: 0.62
, hospital visit
Weight: 0.60
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, ortho
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in samarra 1.00
be have wjheels 0.84
be on okcupid 0.81
be important at work 0.76
have in middle 0.76
go by last period 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(commitment, have in middle)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(commitment, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important at work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(commitment, have in middle)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(date, go by last period)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important at work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(commitment, have in middle)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(date, go by last period)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(board, be have wjheels)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(date, go by last period)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(commitment, have in middle)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(commitment, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(board, be have wjheels)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(board, be have wjheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(appointment, be in samarra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(appointment, be in samarra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(commitment, have in middle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(date, go by last period)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commitment, be important at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(board, be have wjheels)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(commitment, have in middle)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(date, go by last period)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(appointment, be in samarra)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(commitment, be important at work)