appointment: be with doctor necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.67
, application
Weight: 0.62
, date
Weight: 0.59
, commitment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.62
, board
Weight: 0.62
, hospital visit
Weight: 0.60
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, ortho
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with doctor necessary 1.00
be with doctor 0.95
be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment 0.87
be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment 0.78
is necessary 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chairperson, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chairperson, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chairperson, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chairperson, is necessary)