appointment: be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.67
, application
Weight: 0.62
, date
Weight: 0.59
, commitment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.62
, board
Weight: 0.62
, hospital visit
Weight: 0.60
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, ortho
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment 1.00
be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment 0.92
be with doctor necessary 0.78
be important in metabolic pathways 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(step, be important in metabolic pathways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(step, be important in metabolic pathways)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(step, be important in metabolic pathways)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(step, be important in metabolic pathways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during therapy treatment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(step, be important in metabolic pathways)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(appointment, be with doctor necessary during immunologic therapy treatment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(step, be important in metabolic pathways)