appraisal: is different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.65
, property
Weight: 0.62
, evaluation
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, cost
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, condo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is different 1.00
be different across countries 0.80
be different for females 0.79
differ from traditional 0.77
be different for males 0.77
be identical in co-op 0.76
is separate 0.76
is interesting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be different for females)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cost, be different for males)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(activity, differ from traditional)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(activity, differ from traditional)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be different for females)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cost, be different for males)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different for females)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different for males)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cost, be different across countries)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(activity, differ from traditional)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be different for females)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cost, be different across countries)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cost, be different for males)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is different)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cost, be identical in co-op)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is different)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(activity, differ from traditional)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(appraisal, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(appraisal, is different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(activity, differ from traditional)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, be different for females)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cost, be different for males)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(activity, differ from traditional)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cost, be different across countries)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cost, be identical in co-op)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cost, be different for females)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(appraisal, is different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cost, be different for males)