appraisal: is necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.65
, property
Weight: 0.62
, evaluation
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, cost
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, condo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessary 1.00
is needed 0.86
is required 0.84
is essential 0.83
be necessary in educational system 0.80
be insufficient measure of value 0.77
be vital in work planning procedure 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(evaluation, is needed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(evaluation, is needed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(business activity, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(evaluation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(evaluation, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(business activity, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(real estate agent, is needed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(appraisal, is necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is needed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(appraisal, is needed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(appraisal, is required)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is required)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is essential)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is required)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(appraisal, is needed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(appraisal, is required)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(appraisal, is essential)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(appraisal, is essential)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appraisal, is essential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appraisal, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(evaluation, is needed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(evaluation, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(evaluation, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cost, be insufficient measure of value)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evaluation, be necessary in educational system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(appraisal, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(evaluation, be vital in work planning procedure)