apprentice: get paid less

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, show
Weight: 0.54
, program
Weight: 0.53
Siblings intern
Weight: 0.33
, mentor
Weight: 0.32
, janitor
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid less 1.00
get paid 0.93
is paid little 0.92
is paid 0.90
earn little 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(intern, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(intern, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(intern, get paid)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(intern, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(intern, is paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(intern, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(apprentice, get paid less)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, earn little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apprentice, is paid little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(apprentice, is paid little)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(apprentice, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(apprentice, is paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is paid little)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(apprentice, earn little)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apprentice, earn little)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(apprentice, get paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(apprentice, earn little)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apprentice, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(apprentice, get paid less)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(intern, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(intern, is paid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)