apprentice: get treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, show
Weight: 0.54
, program
Weight: 0.53
Siblings intern
Weight: 0.33
, mentor
Weight: 0.32
, janitor
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get treated 1.00
is treated 0.96
get treated badly 0.89
is treated badly 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated badly)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated badly)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(intern, get treated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(intern, is treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(intern, get treated)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(intern, get treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(intern, is treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(intern, get treated badly)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(intern, get treated badly)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(intern, is treated badly)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(intern, is treated badly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(apprentice, get treated)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is treated badly)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(apprentice, is treated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(apprentice, is treated badly)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is treated badly)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated badly)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(apprentice, is treated badly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(apprentice, get treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(intern, is treated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(intern, get treated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(intern, get treated badly)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get treated)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(intern, is treated badly)