apprentice: is paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents student
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, show
Weight: 0.54
, program
Weight: 0.53
Siblings intern
Weight: 0.33
, mentor
Weight: 0.32
, janitor
Weight: 0.32
, trainer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid little 1.00
get paid less 0.92
get paid 0.90
is paid 0.90
earn little 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(intern, is paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(intern, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(intern, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(intern, get paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(intern, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(intern, is paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(apprentice, is paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(apprentice, get paid less)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid less)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get paid less)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, earn little)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(apprentice, get paid less)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(apprentice, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(apprentice, is paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apprentice, earn little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(apprentice, earn little)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(apprentice, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(apprentice, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(apprentice, earn little)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(apprentice, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apprentice, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apprentice, is paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(intern, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(intern, is paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(apprentice, is paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)