apricot: have iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.65
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.65
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.63
, crop
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, quince
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have iron 1.00
be high in iron 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit, have iron)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(apricot, have iron)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit, have iron)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have iron)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(fruit, have iron)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apricot, have iron)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(apricot, have iron)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(apricot, be high in iron)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(apricot, be high in iron)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(apricot, be high in iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(apricot, be high in iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apricot, have iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(apricot, have iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, have iron)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(apricot, have iron)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fruit, have iron)