aquamarine: be vs topaz

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stone
Weight: 0.65
, gem
Weight: 0.65
, film
Weight: 0.50
, crystal
Weight: 0.49
, beryl
Weight: 0.42
Siblings turquoise
Weight: 0.37
, emerald
Weight: 0.36
, sapphire
Weight: 0.35
, peridot
Weight: 0.35
, opal
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs topaz 1.00
be vs blue topaz 0.98
is colorado state gemstone 0.76
be called aquamarine 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(aquamarine, be vs topaz)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(aquamarine, be vs blue topaz)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(aquamarine, be vs blue topaz)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be vs blue topaz)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be vs blue topaz)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be called aquamarine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, is colorado state gemstone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(aquamarine, be called aquamarine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(aquamarine, is colorado state gemstone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(aquamarine, is colorado state gemstone)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(aquamarine, be called aquamarine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(aquamarine, is colorado state gemstone)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be called aquamarine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be vs topaz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(aquamarine, be vs topaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be vs topaz)