aquarium: be bad for animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, site
Weight: 0.59
, exhibit
Weight: 0.59
, museum
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings zoo
Weight: 0.35
, marina
Weight: 0.33
, park
Weight: 0.33
, amusement park
Weight: 0.33
, city hall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for animals 1.00
be good for animals 0.97
provide habitats for dolphins 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(zoo, be good for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(zoo, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(zoo, be good for animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(zoo, be good for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aquarium, provide habitats for dolphins)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aquarium, provide habitats for dolphins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(aquarium, provide habitats for dolphins)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be good for animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, provide habitats for dolphins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(aquarium, be bad for animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zoo, be good for animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be bad for animals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(zoo, be bad for animals)