aquarium: have great white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, site
Weight: 0.59
, exhibit
Weight: 0.59
, museum
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings zoo
Weight: 0.35
, marina
Weight: 0.33
, park
Weight: 0.33
, amusement park
Weight: 0.33
, city hall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have great white 1.00
have white 0.88
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(museum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aquarium, have great white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(museum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(museum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(zoo, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(museum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aquarium, have great white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(zoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(zoo, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aquarium, have great white)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(aquarium, have white)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(aquarium, have white)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(aquarium, have white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aquarium, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(aquarium, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aquarium, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have white)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have great white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aquarium, have great white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(museum, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(zoo, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(aquarium, have great white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(museum, has quality good)