arbitrage: exist

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.48
, topic
Weight: 0.47
, term
Weight: 0.46
, factor
Weight: 0.42
Siblings investment
Weight: 0.32
, consolidation
Weight: 0.32
, framework
Weight: 0.31
, marketing
Weight: 0.31
, commodity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, exist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, exist)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marketing, exist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(arbitrage, exist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(arbitrage, exist)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arbitrage, exist)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(arbitrage, exist)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(marketing, exist)