arch: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.68
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dome
Weight: 0.34
, pyramid
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.34
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.33
, helix
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00
is expensive 0.76
be like profitable 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arch, is attractive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pattern, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arch, is attractive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(feature, is attractive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pattern, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(feature, is attractive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pattern, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arch, is attractive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pattern, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arch, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(skyscraper, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(eiffel tower, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(arch, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arch, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pattern, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skyscraper, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(arch, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pattern, is expensive)