archaeologist: disagree how interpret

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.66
, expert
Weight: 0.62
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, writer
Weight: 0.54
Siblings archeologist
Weight: 0.38
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, biologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.36
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
disagree how interpret 1.00
disagree interpret 0.97
have interpret 0.90
interpret evidence 0.83
do archaeology 0.77
do 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeologist, do archaeology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(archaeologist, do)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeologist, have interpret)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(archaeologist, do)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(archaeologist, do archaeology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(archaeologist, do)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(archaeologist, have interpret)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, do)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(archaeologist, do archaeology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(archaeologist, have interpret)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, have interpret)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, do archaeology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(archaeologist, disagree how interpret)