architect: have handwriting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have handwriting 1.00
have same handwriting 0.98
have specific handwriting 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(artist, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, have handwriting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(artist, have handwriting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(artist, have handwriting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(artist, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(architect, have handwriting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(architect, have handwriting)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(architect, have same handwriting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(architect, have same handwriting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(architect, have same handwriting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(architect, have same handwriting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(architect, have handwriting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, have handwriting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artist, have handwriting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(architect, have handwriting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artist, have handwriting)