architect: is licensed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is licensed 1.00
have licensed 0.99
need licensed 0.98
need license 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(contractor, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architect, is licensed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architect, is licensed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contractor, is licensed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(contractor, need license)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is licensed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need license)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(contractor, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(architect, is licensed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(contractor, need license) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(architect, is licensed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(architect, is licensed)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(architect, have licensed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(architect, have licensed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(architect, need licensed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(architect, have licensed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(architect, need licensed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(architect, need license)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(architect, need licensed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, need licensed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(architect, need license)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(architect, have licensed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(architect, need license)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(architect, need license)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architect, is licensed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, is licensed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(contractor, need license)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, is licensed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architect, is licensed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(contractor, need license)