architect: is work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work 1.00
work 0.98
find work 0.87
need work together 0.83
get job 0.79
is good job 0.78
work long hours 0.77
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialist, work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(contractor, work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(contractor, is work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(contractor, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(specialist, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(contractor, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(specialist, work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(contractor, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contractor, is work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, has state job)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(contractor, is work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(specialist, work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(contractor, work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(contractor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(engineer, need work together)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(engineer, need work together)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work together)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(construction worker, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has state job)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(engineer, has state job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(engineer, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(architect, is work)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(architect, work)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(architect, work)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(architect, need work together)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(architect, need work together)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(architect, get job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, is good job)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(architect, work long hours)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(architect, get job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(architect, has state job)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architect, get job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(architect, need work together)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(architect, get job)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(architect, need work together)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(architect, has state job)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architect, has state job)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(architect, is good job)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(architect, work long hours)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(architect, has state job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(architect, is good job)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(architect, work long hours)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(architect, is good job)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(architect, work long hours)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(architect, is work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialist, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(construction worker, has state job)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(engineer, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, is work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(contractor, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(specialist, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(architect, is work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contractor, has state job)