architect: mean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
mean 1.00
do 0.77
need know 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(architect, mean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(contractor, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, mean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(painter, do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, need know)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(builder, need know)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(architect, mean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(carpenter, mean)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(carpenter, mean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(painter, do)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(painter, do)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(builder, need know)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(builder, need know)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(carpenter, need know)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(carpenter, need know)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(architect, mean)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architect, need know)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(architect, do)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, need know)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(architect, need know)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(architect, need know)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(architect, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(carpenter, mean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painter, do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(builder, need know)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(carpenter, need know)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(architect, mean)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)