architecture: be considered science

Related concepts

Parents	element Weight: 0.65 , computer architecture Weight: 0.64 , technology Weight: 0.63 , sculpture Weight: 0.62
Siblings	castle Weight: 0.61 , pyramid Weight: 0.60 , topology Weight: 0.54 , skyscraper Weight: 0.49 , steeple Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered science	1.00
be science	0.94
is science	0.93
be related to science	0.90
be related science	0.90
be physical science	0.89
be related physical science	0.86
be afraid of science	0.86
be related to environmental science	0.84
be used in math	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(architecture, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(architecture, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(architecture, be physical science)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(architecture, be physical science)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be physical science)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be afraid of science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(architecture, be afraid of science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(architecture, be afraid of science)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(architecture, is science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(architecture, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(architecture, be physical science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(architecture, is science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(architecture, be used in math)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(architecture, be used in math)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related physical science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(architecture, be related physical science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(architecture, be related physical science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(architecture, be afraid of science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(architecture, be related physical science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(architecture, be related to science)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to science)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(architecture, be related science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(architecture, be related science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(architecture, be related science)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(architecture, be considered science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)